Supremacist History Repeating Again
February 18, 2009
by Jeffrey Imm
Responsible for Equality And
Liberty (R.E.A.L.)
http://www.realcourage.org/?p=47
http://www.unitedstatesaction.com/blog/imm-articles/126.html
The speaker demanded that their supremacist ideology needed to be
accommodated by the government, and called for a "new era." The speaker
said that his people must be allowed to have laws in place to support
this supremacist ideology.
Perhaps you think I am referencing the
grim
situation for
human rights in Pakistan, where the
Taliban's push for
implementing
Islamic supremacist Sharia law in northwest Pakistan has
succeeded in obtaining surrender by the Pakistan government on this.
The result is that the people in that part of Pakistan will soon be
ruled by an Islamic supremacist ideology with its own outlook, its own
Sharia laws, and its own Islamic supremacist version of "justice."
Perhaps you think I am remarking on the
statements reported on February 18, 2009 in Pakistan by Islamic
supremacist Tehreek-e-Nifaz-e-Shariat Muhammadi (TNSM) chief Maulana
Sufi Mohammad who attacked democracy
stating, "From the very beginning, I have viewed democracy as a
system imposed on us by the infidels. Islam does not allow democracy or
elections... I believe the Taliban government formed a complete Islamic
state, which was an ideal example for other Muslim countries. Had this
government remained intact, it could have led to the establishment of
similar Islamic governments in many other countries." This is the same
Sufi Mohammad who told
news reporters that "democracy is against the teachings of the Holy
Quran and Sunnah" and that he "regarded democracy a system of Kufr
(unbelief)."
In fact, I am referring to both of these. But I am also referring to
another man, at another time, and in another place - who echoed very
similar sentiments.
It was
February 18, 1939 - seventy years ago - with another supremacist group.
Then it was in Czechoslovakia with a Dr. Kundt stating that he
represented Germans with his National Socialist party beliefs of Aryan
supremacism. You may remember them as the "Nazis."
Seventy years ago,
Dr. Kundt also demanded separate laws defying equality and liberty
for his Nazi supremacist group,
stating: "Germans must be allowed their own Nazi outlook, their own
Nazi laws, their own Nazi habits, and their own Nazi justice. It is high
time that these things were done. History does not wait. We, however,
march on with the history of the new era, for our leader is Adolf
Hitler. His will and his 'Weltanschauung' (philosophy) will from today
dictate all the plans and arrangements of this house in Prague and will
dictate every activity of the Urania."
History would later show the atrocities and evil wrought by allowing
such supremacism to grow unchecked. Nazism was a supremacist ideology
that sought the destruction of all those who would defy it, sought a
"final solution" for Jews, posed a transnational threat, and sought to
conquer the world. Sound familiar?
The similarities between 1939 and 2009 continue to grow daily.
The muted reaction by many of our government leaders to the latest
growth of Islamic supremacism in the
nuclear weapon-armed nation of Pakistan mirrors such tenacious
denial by these leaders on Islamic supremacism in America and around the
world.
Their sickening silence is only exacerbated by their few public
statements that demonstrate a shocking ignorance towards human rights
and an outrageous contempt for the inalienable human rights of equality
and liberty.
In response to the Pakistan surrender to the Islamic supremacist
Taliban's demands for implementation of Sharia law in the North West
Frontier Province (NWFP), Secretary of State
Hillary Clinton has merely stated that she wants to see the Pakistan
government's "intention and the actual agreed-upon language."
Mrs. Clinton wants us to believe that she is unaware of the
Islamic supremacist
Sharia law's intention to suppress the equality and liberty of
women, men, and children in Pakistan and around the world. She wants us
to believe she doesn't know about the
UN
report on growing global Muslim violence against women. She wants us
to believe she doesn't know about how the Taliban has used Islamic
supremacist Sharia law to
justify
threatening,
murdering, and
dumping the bodies of women in Pakistan. She wants us to believe she
doesn't know about the
million
pregnant women abused in Pakistan every year, or the
news media reports of nearly 8,000 cases of abuses against women,
including Islamic supremacist "honor killings," in Pakistan in 2008.
Just like we are supposed to believe that she is unaware of the
Muslim women beaten and
murdered in her state of New York --
one last week who was beheaded by her husband, the CEO of Bridges
TV, whose mission was to "promote moderate Islam."
While Mrs. Clinton may want us to believe that she is unaware of all
these world events as America's Secretary of State, in fact, we know
better. So does she. As U.S. Senator representing New York, she was a
co-sponsor
on
Senate Resolution 711 condemning the death of a 13 year old girl in
Somalia last October. The girl was stoned to death for her "crime" of
being a rape victim. She was
stoned to death
by Somalian Islamic supremacists following Sharia law, stating "We
will do what Allah has instructed us," while 1,000 looked on and
watched. This is the same Islamic supremacist Sharia law that Pakistan's
surrender will allow to be imposed on helpless
women and
children
in Pakistan.
U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton also wants us to suspend our
disbelief as
she speaks to Muslim leaders in Indonesia as a fellow "democracy,"
whose citizens
openly
call for Islamic jihad
on
other nations, publicly
promote
and distribute Islamic supremacist literature and books,
hold
massive public rallies denouncing democracy that
call for the creation of a global Islamic supremacist caliphate, and
whose Islamic supremacists behead Christian girls. She is meeting
with Indonesia's so-called "democratic" leaders who
deny the
existence of the Islamic supremacist terror group Jemaah Islamiyah
in their nation, and who seek
to promote Islamic supremacist finance. She also expects us
to ignore the growth of Islamic supremacist Sharia law throughout
Indonesia, and
the
continuing
reports
of
Indonesian
oppression
of
religious
minorities in that "democracy." Perhaps Mrs. Clinton forgot that
democratic nations have democratic values, including honoring equality
and liberty.
While
Mrs. Clinton claims in Indonesia that "Islam, democracy and
modernity cannot only coexist but thrive together," Pakistan's advocate
for Sharia law, Islamic supremacist Maulana Sufi Mohammad
condemns democracy
as un-Islamic and only for the infidel.
But
Mrs. Clinton and her State Department have "no comment" on the
growth of Islamic supremacist Sharia law in Pakistan or on the attacks
on democracy by Pakistan Sharia law advocate Maulana Sufi Mohammad.
At least, those were the
initial comments by Mrs. Clinton's State Department representative,
Gordon Duguid. But then Gordon Duguid decided to
defend Pakistan's surrender to the Islamic supremacist Taliban, stating:
"The Islamic law is within the constitutional framework of Pakistan... I
don't know that is particularly an issue for anyone outside of Pakistan
to discuss."
Do Islamic supremacists merely seek imposition of Sharia law only in
Pakistan, Somalia, and Indonesia?
Islamic supremacists
seek to conquer the entire Earth
to submit to their supremacism - Asia, Africa, Europe, the United
Kingdom, and North America.
As the Pakistan Daily Times
reports, Maulana Sufi Mohammad's
goals for implementing Islamic supremacist Sharia are nothing less
than seeking
"supremacy of Islam over the entire world."
But the U.S. State Department has "no comment" on this, nor do they
think it is "an issue for anyone outside of Pakistan to discuss."
Hillary Clinton's State Department is continuing a craven position of
"hear no evil, see no evil" regarding
Islamic supremacism that is becoming entrenched within
appeasers among
foreign policy cliques in Washington DC. This community of the blind
and deaf are the same amoral individuals that have included
Obama campaign foreign policy advisor
Dennis Ross, who was
part of the
U.S.-Muslim Engagement Project that called for negotiations with the
Islamic supremacist Muslim Brotherhood back in September 2008.
The most disturbing
report is by the Daily Telegraph and it
states that the "US privately backs Pakistan's 'Sharia law for peace'
deal with Taliban." The
report quotes anonymous "American officials in Islamabad" that view
Pakistan surrender to the Taliban on Islamic supremacist Sharia law in
Pakistan's northwest as a possible tactic to "divide" members within the
Taliban. The
report also states that alleged U.S. support for the Pakistan
surrender of human dignity and rights to Islamic supremacism
"reflected the 'smart power' thinking outlined by Hillary Clinton."
We can only hope that amoral tacticians are not consciously empowering
Islamic supremacists with the delusion that sacrificing the helpless in
Pakistan will satisfy Islamic supremacists' goals for world domination.
Does America's State Department think that appeasing Islamic
supremacists will yield "peace in our time"? Are American politicians so
historically ignorant that they believe a policy of appeasement is
"smart power"?
Whether such inaction on Islamic supremacism is due to amorality,
ignorance, or blindness - the responsibility does not change.
Pretending to be blind and deaf about Islamic supremacism does not
excuse their responsibility for its appeasement - any more than being
blind and deaf about the Aryan supremacist Nazis in 1939 ended
responsibility for its appeasement then. History shows the consequences
of those failures.
This is the same U.S. government leadership whose president is the
greatest beneficiary of
America's defiance against supremacism in history, who took his
presidential vows on Lincoln's Bible, and who spoke at Lincoln's
memorial - mere steps away from the
words hammered in marble that "all men are created equal." Does his
government now view that
equality and liberty are not a sufficient priority to defy Islamic
supremacism?
If President Barack Obama and his cabinet are responsible for equality
and liberty, then it is time for them to wake up to the threat of
Islamic supremacism. Right now. It is 2009... the 1939 of our generation
and
it is time to confront Islamic supremacism as its cancer grows
around the world, and as
shown by the
recent "Homegrown Jihad" video - in
camps around the United States.
Will a future generation look back on the craven positions by today's
leaders on Islamic supremacism like we do today on those who denied the
threat of Nazism's Aryan supremacism in 1939? Instead of saying "it is
just like 1939," will they say instead "it is just like 2009"? That is a
legacy that our generation must prevent, and a future that we must take
control of... before it takes control of us.
The 3 AM telephone call is ringing tonight in Washington DC. Will
neither Barack Obama nor Hillary Clinton pick up the telephone and
wake up -- as equality and liberty itself are imperiled
around the world?
The emergency call on the threat to equality and liberty must be
answered - by our government leaders - and by each of us as free men and
women. We must heed the call - right now - no matter how inconvenient,
no matter how tired we are, and no matter how frightening the
responsibility is. That is what it means to be
responsible for equality and liberty. That is what it means to be
the home of the brave.
We have received the call to action as free people to be responsible for
equality and liberty by
defying
Islamic supremacism in America and around the world. Now it is time
for us to
act to get the message out to our fellow Americans and our leaders.
It is our judgment, our courage, and our wisdom today that we must prove
in defending equality and liberty, and to show that...
We Fear No Evil.
[Postscript - see also
Sources documents for additional reading and background
information.]
|
.jpg){kind=link}